<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Natalie Tootie &#187; Congress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://natalietootie.com/tag/congress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://natalietootie.com</link>
	<description>Personal Pop Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 08:59:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Democratic Dissenters</title>
		<link>http://natalietootie.com/2009/03/12/democratic-dissenters/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=democratic-dissenters</link>
		<comments>http://natalietootie.com/2009/03/12/democratic-dissenters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 04:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rachel Maddow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natalietootie.com/?p=1409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A group of 15 to 20 democratic moderates in the senate are forming a loose coalition to focus on deficit reduction and fiscal responsibility.

Rachel Maddow is very upset about this, because how dare anyone have a dissenting opinion. Rachel has showed us tonight that everyone has to agree with her or she gets very upset. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A group of 15 to 20 democratic moderates in the senate are forming a loose coalition to focus on deficit reduction and fiscal responsibility.</p>

<p>Rachel Maddow is very upset about this, because how dare anyone have a dissenting opinion. Rachel has showed us tonight that everyone has to agree with her or she gets very upset. She&#8217;s now making fun of the whole concept of fiscal responsibility.</p>

<p>This doesn&#8217;t mean these people will be voting with the republicans, although Rachel is trying to scare us into thinking that. It doesn&#8217;t mean they&#8217;re going to hold up democratic legislation. It just means they are coming together to help push their moderate purpose into that democratic legislation.</p>

<p>We saw what happened when the republicans didn&#8217;t have any moderation. Do we want that to happen to the democrats? Apparently Rachel thinks that it&#8217;s a good idea for the democrats to be as extreme and one sided as the republicans. Luckily, some people feel differently. And those people will keep recent democratic converts from switching back to the other side.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://natalietootie.com/2009/03/12/democratic-dissenters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Employee Free Choice Act</title>
		<link>http://natalietootie.com/2009/03/09/employee-free-choice-act/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=employee-free-choice-act</link>
		<comments>http://natalietootie.com/2009/03/09/employee-free-choice-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 04:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natalietootie.com/?p=1354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tomorrow (Tuesday) democrats will introduce legislation for the Employee Free Choice Act, or EFCA. This would essentially make it easier for employees to form unions. Right now employers require employees to hold a secret ballot election to form a union. This act would allow the employees to determine the process by which they form a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tomorrow (Tuesday) democrats will introduce legislation for the Employee Free Choice Act, or EFCA. This would essentially make it easier for employees to form unions. Right now employers require employees to hold a secret ballot election to form a union. This act would allow the employees to determine the process by which they form a union whether it be secret ballot or a raise of hands or whatever.</p>

<p>I&#8217;ll tell you my opinion on this. If you&#8217;re in a job that either requires you to join a union or makes you want to join a union, study up if you need to, and find another job. If your employer doesn&#8217;t respect you he will find a way to screw you over one way or another. Remember, your employer is in control.</p>

<p>Now there are cases where I like unions, where they protect workers who would otherwise be very much taken advantage of. But I would say unions are rarely the answer rather than commonly the answer. And I would definitely say that in every case unions are corrupt and in most cases stop representing the employees&#8217; best interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://natalietootie.com/2009/03/09/employee-free-choice-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans Call for Spending Freeze</title>
		<link>http://natalietootie.com/2009/03/06/republicans-call-for-spending-freeze/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=republicans-call-for-spending-freeze</link>
		<comments>http://natalietootie.com/2009/03/06/republicans-call-for-spending-freeze/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 03:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natalietootie.com/?p=1347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The republicans in congress are calling for a spending freeze. No reasons why it would help, just a spending freeze. Just, &#8216;Hey guys, why don&#8217;t we freeze spending!&#8221;

I love how they see no need for logic. It also shows a fundamental misunderstanding of how economies work. I mean, saying the economy is bad is the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The republicans in congress are calling for a spending freeze. No reasons why it would help, just a spending freeze. Just, &#8216;Hey guys, why don&#8217;t we freeze spending!&#8221;</p>

<p>I love how they see no need for logic. It also shows a fundamental misunderstanding of how economies work. I mean, saying the economy is bad is the same thing precisely as saying spending has gone down. So how would a spending freeze fix the spending going down?</p>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://natalietootie.com/2009/03/06/republicans-call-for-spending-freeze/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Science, Science, Science, Science&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://natalietootie.com/2009/02/25/science-science-science-science/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=science-science-science-science</link>
		<comments>http://natalietootie.com/2009/02/25/science-science-science-science/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 02:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natalietootie.com/?p=1268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Four words Nancy Pelosi uses to describe congress&#8217; initiatives. &#8220;We want to have the best scientific basis and the best scientific methods as we go forward to put together this health care reform.&#8221;

It&#8217;s so nice that people are talking about using science and logic and maybe even facts to make laws.

Another great quote from Nancy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Four words Nancy Pelosi uses to describe congress&#8217; initiatives. &#8220;We want to have the best scientific basis and the best scientific methods as we go forward to put together this health care reform.&#8221;</p>

<p>It&#8217;s so nice that people are talking about using science and logic and maybe even facts to make laws.</p>

<p>Another great quote from Nancy Pelosi on the republicans, &#8220;They [the republicans] came out very poorly in this. But bless their hearts, they vote for what they believe in, and they do not believe in a new direction for America. They are committed to the path that we were on that got us here in the first place.&#8221;</p>

<p>Nice, that&#8217;s brilliant politics. Bless their hearts, indeed.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://natalietootie.com/2009/02/25/science-science-science-science/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s Speech: Inspiration</title>
		<link>http://natalietootie.com/2009/02/24/obamas-speech-inspiration/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=obamas-speech-inspiration</link>
		<comments>http://natalietootie.com/2009/02/24/obamas-speech-inspiration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 05:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goodness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speeches]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natalietootie.com/?p=1258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama is now talking about some inspirational people in America. And I can&#8217;t help but think about how George W. Bush never uttered a truly inspirational word during his entire presidency. Thank God he&#8217;s gone.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is now talking about some inspirational people in America. And I can&#8217;t help but think about how George W. Bush never uttered a truly inspirational word during his entire presidency. Thank God he&#8217;s gone.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://natalietootie.com/2009/02/24/obamas-speech-inspiration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s Speech: Education</title>
		<link>http://natalietootie.com/2009/02/24/obamas-speech-education/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=obamas-speech-education</link>
		<comments>http://natalietootie.com/2009/02/24/obamas-speech-education/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 05:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speeches]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natalietootie.com/?p=1255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really like what Obama is saying about education. It&#8217;s nice to have a president who cares. He&#8217;s talking about offering higher education to those that serve our country.

As an aside, I wonder who&#8217;s sitting in the upper seats along the walls of the room. I think it would be great to be in one [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like what Obama is saying about education. It&#8217;s nice to have a president who cares. He&#8217;s talking about offering higher education to those that serve our country.</p>

<p>As an aside, I wonder who&#8217;s sitting in the upper seats along the walls of the room. I think it would be great to be in one of those seats. You can witness the speech first hand and still yawn if you need to.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://natalietootie.com/2009/02/24/obamas-speech-education/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s Speech: Children&#8217;s Health Insurance</title>
		<link>http://natalietootie.com/2009/02/24/obamas-speech-childrens-health-insurance/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=obamas-speech-childrens-health-insurance</link>
		<comments>http://natalietootie.com/2009/02/24/obamas-speech-childrens-health-insurance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 05:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speeches]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natalietootie.com/?p=1252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republicans are again notably not clapping for children&#8217;s health insurance. They sure do know how to make themselves look like the bad guys.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans are again notably <i>not</i> clapping for children&#8217;s health insurance. They sure do know how to make themselves look like the bad guys.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://natalietootie.com/2009/02/24/obamas-speech-childrens-health-insurance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s Speech: Nancy Pelosi</title>
		<link>http://natalietootie.com/2009/02/24/obamas-speech-nancy-pelosi/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=obamas-speech-nancy-pelosi</link>
		<comments>http://natalietootie.com/2009/02/24/obamas-speech-nancy-pelosi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 05:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speeches]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natalietootie.com/?p=1249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi is searching deep down in her soul for ways not to look bored. I feel so bad for her having to be on camera the whole time. When they show the rest of congress they are all hiding yawns. It&#8217;s too bad they can&#8217;t have laptops at this time.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nancy Pelosi is searching deep down in her soul for ways not to look bored. I feel so bad for her having to be on camera the whole time. When they show the rest of congress they are all hiding yawns. It&#8217;s too bad they can&#8217;t have laptops at this time.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://natalietootie.com/2009/02/24/obamas-speech-nancy-pelosi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s Speech: Republicans</title>
		<link>http://natalietootie.com/2009/02/24/obamas-speech-republicans/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=obamas-speech-republicans</link>
		<comments>http://natalietootie.com/2009/02/24/obamas-speech-republicans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 05:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speeches]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natalietootie.com/?p=1242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama&#8217;s talking about the recovery bill and highlighting some of the great things that are happening because of it. Teachers and police officers keeping their jobs. Parents getting tax credits for kids in college. And even the tax cuts. The democrats are cheering, but the republicans aren&#8217;t, at all. You&#8217;d think they&#8217;d at least clap [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama&#8217;s talking about the recovery bill and highlighting some of the great things that are happening because of it. Teachers and police officers keeping their jobs. Parents getting tax credits for kids in college. And even the tax cuts. The democrats are cheering, but the republicans aren&#8217;t, at all. You&#8217;d think they&#8217;d at least clap for the tax cuts. How can republicans not clap for teachers and police officers?</p>

<p>The republicans say they&#8217;re politicians, but they&#8217;ve gone from kissing babies to knifing them, and they expect us to like them for it. Well we don&#8217;t. I personally can&#8217;t wait to watch the republican party slide into oblivion. We&#8217;re talking about teachers and police officers here, don&#8217;t be such douche bags.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://natalietootie.com/2009/02/24/obamas-speech-republicans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s Speech: The Introduction</title>
		<link>http://natalietootie.com/2009/02/24/obamas-speech-the-introduction/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=obamas-speech-the-introduction</link>
		<comments>http://natalietootie.com/2009/02/24/obamas-speech-the-introduction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speeches]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natalietootie.com/?p=1239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m watching the President&#8217;s speech on the web so I can pause and fast forward. What is the deal with him coming out and congress cheering like fans and trying to shake his hand. This is congress, for goodness sake. They know him and if they have something to say they should say it later. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m watching the President&#8217;s speech on the web so I can pause and fast forward. What is the deal with him coming out and congress cheering like fans and trying to shake his hand. This is congress, for goodness sake. They know him and if they have something to say they should say it later. And Obama&#8217;s shaking hands with the Vice President for some reason. Weren&#8217;t they together just a few minutes ago? It&#8217;s so fake.</p>

<p>I actually have a positive attitude, but what a load of crap. Can&#8217;t he just come in and talk?</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://natalietootie.com/2009/02/24/obamas-speech-the-introduction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Congressional Republican Approval Rating Drops</title>
		<link>http://natalietootie.com/2009/02/18/congressional-republican-approval-rating-drops/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=congressional-republican-approval-rating-drops</link>
		<comments>http://natalietootie.com/2009/02/18/congressional-republican-approval-rating-drops/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 04:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natalietootie.com/?p=1176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was doubting the way congressional republicans were acting, basically trying to block all legislation to help their constituents, would win them many fans. After all, republican constituents are losing their jobs and houses as much as democrats. Well it turns it they are losing popularity. Their approval rating went down from 23% to 19%.

The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was doubting the way congressional republicans were acting, basically trying to block all legislation to help their constituents, would win them many fans. After all, republican constituents are losing their jobs and houses as much as democrats. Well it turns it they are losing popularity. Their approval rating went down from 23% to 19%.</p>

<p>The democratic congressional approval rating went up from 18% to 43%. My question is, exactly who to the republicans think they&#8217;re representing? Their constituents or their party? Well it seriously looks possible that the whole republican party is going to implode upon itself. Right now, they aren&#8217;t helping anyone, so I don&#8217;t see how they can expect to get votes.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://natalietootie.com/2009/02/18/congressional-republican-approval-rating-drops/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Al Franken vs. Norm Coleman</title>
		<link>http://natalietootie.com/2009/02/18/al-franken-vs-norm-coleman/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=al-franken-vs-norm-coleman</link>
		<comments>http://natalietootie.com/2009/02/18/al-franken-vs-norm-coleman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 04:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Franken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norm Coleman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natalietootie.com/?p=1173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The fight in Minnesota is getting more interesting. Norm Coleman&#8217;s team is now suggesting the whole election should be redone. I find this hilarious. First he&#8217;s suggesting it&#8217;s a perfectly valid election when he&#8217;s ahead by just a few votes, but then when he&#8217;s behind by just a few votes it&#8217;s an invalid election. Politicians!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fight in Minnesota is getting more interesting. Norm Coleman&#8217;s team is now suggesting the whole election should be redone. I find this hilarious. First he&#8217;s suggesting it&#8217;s a perfectly valid election when he&#8217;s ahead by just a few votes, but then when he&#8217;s behind by just a few votes it&#8217;s an invalid election. Politicians!</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://natalietootie.com/2009/02/18/al-franken-vs-norm-coleman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roland Burris Asked to Step Down</title>
		<link>http://natalietootie.com/2009/02/18/roland-burris-asked-to-step-down/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=roland-burris-asked-to-step-down</link>
		<comments>http://natalietootie.com/2009/02/18/roland-burris-asked-to-step-down/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 04:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rod Blagojevich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roland Burris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natalietootie.com/?p=1171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Democratic senator Roland Burris of Illinois is already being asked to step down by some fellow democrats. The issue is whether he did favors (not sexual) for Rod Blagojevich in return for his senate appointment.

Oh brother, would he really have done something so stupid in this political climate? We&#8217;ll see.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democratic senator Roland Burris of Illinois is already being asked to step down by some fellow democrats. The issue is whether he did favors (not sexual) for Rod Blagojevich in return for his senate appointment.</p>

<p>Oh brother, would he really have done something so stupid in this political climate? We&#8217;ll see.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://natalietootie.com/2009/02/18/roland-burris-asked-to-step-down/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Connie Mack, Stupid Republican</title>
		<link>http://natalietootie.com/2009/02/10/connie-mack-stupid-republican/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=connie-mack-stupid-republican</link>
		<comments>http://natalietootie.com/2009/02/10/connie-mack-stupid-republican/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Add new tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connie Mack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natalietootie.com/?p=1116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
  


This is Florida Congressman, Connie Mac, who says, &#8220;Oops, sorry about the last 8 years, we messed up, but now we want to do the right thing. By the way, I have no idea what that is.&#8221; He also says that Obama didn&#8217;t talk about jobs last night. Um, that&#8217;s mostly what he [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="width: 425px; height: 339px; margin: 0px auto 20px;" >
  <iframe height="339" width="425" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/29117871#29117871" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe>
</div>

<p>This is Florida Congressman, Connie Mac, who says, &#8220;Oops, sorry about the last 8 years, we messed up, but now we want to do the right thing. By the way, I have no idea what that is.&#8221; He also says that Obama didn&#8217;t talk about jobs last night. Um, that&#8217;s <i>mostly</i> what he talked about. Then he says he hopes Obama will leave the town hall meeting and go talk to the people. What? Yes, Obama, leave the town hall meetings, filled with people, and take some time out to talk to, um, the people. Stop talking to the people when you should be talking to the people! Connie Mack is an idiot.</p>

<p>The truth is, when republicans are in power they spend a make government larger, when democrats are in power they want to make government smaller. We&#8217;ve seen this before.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://natalietootie.com/2009/02/10/connie-mack-stupid-republican/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senator Barbara Boxer of California (D)</title>
		<link>http://natalietootie.com/2009/02/09/senator-barbara-boxer-of-california-d/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=senator-barbara-boxer-of-california-d</link>
		<comments>http://natalietootie.com/2009/02/09/senator-barbara-boxer-of-california-d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 05:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rachel Maddow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natalietootie.com/?p=1112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just watched Rachel Maddow&#8217;s interview with Senator Barbara Boxer of California who is a democrat. Watching her was depressing.

Her basic statement was &#8220;I sure wish we could to something but we&#8217;re powerless and this the way Washington works.&#8221; When asked about a purely stimulative item being taken out of the bill by a republican [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just watched Rachel Maddow&#8217;s interview with Senator Barbara Boxer of California who is a democrat. Watching her was depressing.</p>

<p>Her basic statement was &#8220;I sure wish we could to something but we&#8217;re powerless and this the way Washington works.&#8221; When asked about a purely stimulative item being taken out of the bill by a republican senator who was never going to vote for it anyway, Barbara basically said the rest of us, that is the citizens of the United States, just don&#8217;t understand how the Senate works.</p>

<p>Well Barbara Boxer, if we regular people are never going to understand why the Senate does absolutely stupid things, then you&#8217;ll have to forgive us when we just plain give up on you. Because that&#8217;s what we&#8217;re doing. Barbara Boxer, you are pathetic and useless.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://natalietootie.com/2009/02/09/senator-barbara-boxer-of-california-d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senator Ben Nelson of Nebraska (D)</title>
		<link>http://natalietootie.com/2009/02/09/senator-ben-nelson-of-nebraska-d/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=senator-ben-nelson-of-nebraska-d</link>
		<comments>http://natalietootie.com/2009/02/09/senator-ben-nelson-of-nebraska-d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 04:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rachel Maddow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natalietootie.com/?p=1107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just finished watching Rachel Maddow interview Senator Ben Nelson of Nebraska who is a democrat. I&#8217;ll get right to the point, this man is an idiot who should be fired immediately.

Basically he negotiated to take a bunch of stimulative items out of the stimulus bill to gain Republican support. Now if he just admitted [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just finished watching Rachel Maddow interview Senator Ben Nelson of Nebraska who is a democrat. I&#8217;ll get right to the point, this man is an idiot who should be fired immediately.</p>

<p>Basically he negotiated to take a bunch of stimulative items out of the stimulus bill to gain Republican support. Now if he just admitted that, it would be one thing. However Rachel kept bringing up things he had dropped out of the bill that were clearly stimulative, such as money for building schools, money for firefighters, and money for food stamps, which is the most stimulative item we know of because it all gets spent on stuff.</p>

<p>After she would ask him about each of these things he would double talk and try to switch the topic in the worst, most obvious way. When she asked him about money dropped for building schools, he claimed that the government should not mandate school programs like &#8220;no child left behind&#8221; or &#8220;special education&#8221; (yes, he did) because then they wouldn&#8217;t back it up with funding. But what she was talking about was money that was all funding and no mandate. He literally wasn&#8217;t making any sense, and the frown on Rachel&#8217;s face was hilarious. Her face said, &#8220;You sir, are a total retard.&#8221; I guess he should be thankful for special education after all.</p>

<p>If you are a constituent of Ben Nelson please replace him with another democrat in the next election. He&#8217;s an idiot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://natalietootie.com/2009/02/09/senator-ben-nelson-of-nebraska-d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>President Obama does not Suck</title>
		<link>http://natalietootie.com/2009/02/09/president-obama-does-not-suck/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=president-obama-does-not-suck</link>
		<comments>http://natalietootie.com/2009/02/09/president-obama-does-not-suck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 04:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natalietootie.com/?p=1103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I finally got around to reading the Obama transcript from tonight&#8217;s press conference. All the video is backed up, it must be popular. I just want to say that he still impresses me as he is actually using logic and backing up his statements with the knowledge of experts. If only the members of Congress [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I finally got around to reading the Obama transcript from tonight&#8217;s press conference. All the video is backed up, it must be popular. I just want to say that he still impresses me as he is actually using logic and backing up his statements with the knowledge of experts. If only the members of Congress could do the same. Maybe he&#8217;ll teach them.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://natalietootie.com/2009/02/09/president-obama-does-not-suck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Congress Sucks</title>
		<link>http://natalietootie.com/2009/02/09/congress-sucks/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=congress-sucks</link>
		<comments>http://natalietootie.com/2009/02/09/congress-sucks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 02:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natalietootie.com/?p=1100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m just about to start watching Rachel Maddow. But for the last week she&#8217;s been heavily covering discussion and the negotiation of the stimulus bill. What I&#8217;ve learned is that the members of congress are pathetic.

I don&#8217;t want these people, Democrats or Republicans, deciding how my tax dollars are spent. It looks like it&#8217;s just [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just about to start watching Rachel Maddow. But for the last week she&#8217;s been heavily covering discussion and the negotiation of the stimulus bill. What I&#8217;ve learned is that the members of congress are pathetic.</p>

<p>I don&#8217;t want these people, Democrats or Republicans, deciding how my tax dollars are spent. It looks like it&#8217;s just going to be a big expensive useless bill. I want economists to decide what to do. Politicians know almost nothing about economics, but they&#8217;re the ones making the decisions, and it shows.</p>

<p>I hate to just throw this out there, but I have completely lost faith in our government. It&#8217;s just ridiculous. I don&#8217;t know what we should do next, but I do know this, I want the smartest people for a topic making the decisions about that topic. No more politicians.</p>

<p>Yes, not a terribly productive post, but this is not something we can negotiate our way out of. Our government is fundamentally broken, and it&#8217;s only going to get worse. Just wait and see and try to enjoy the ride.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://natalietootie.com/2009/02/09/congress-sucks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
